That ‘Chinese’ fler in the Interlok review panel

Assoc Prof Lim Swee Tin (pix) of UPM is the only Chinese in the 8-member Interlok review panel.

MIC president G Palanivel was quoted as revealing that out of the 100-plus ‘errors’ in the novel, 85 concerned the chapter on Maniam.

____________________________

UPDATED (March 30): One of the NIAT panellists clarified at the press conference today that 19 amendments concerned the objectionable content about Indians, whereas the 85 (or 87) other amendments were for word and language use (e.g. spelling of ‘thali’ not ‘tali, etc)

____________________________

The Indian story comes in Part 3 of the book; Part 1 is about the Malay protagonist, Pt 2 (Chinese) and Pt 4 (their lives intersect).

So the panel apparently found a total of some 100 elements that are objectionable about the writing.

Doing a little simple math (100-85=15), the remaining 15 sensitive descriptions would have covered together Parts 1,2, and 4.

Take away some of the errors complained about by the four Malay panellists, and you have leftover the number of erroneous passages with regard to the Chinese (Cing Huat’s story) narrative.

Considering the Indian panellists found 85 things to be all wrong when author Abdullah Hussain talks about Indians, it’s shocking that Lim Swee Tin finds so little (two? four? or six?) that is offensive about how the Chinese are depicted in Interlok.

On the other hand, we at Hartal MSM found a whole lot that is offensive in how Abdullah portrayed the Chinese community.

FMT yesterday reported that “the trio [three Indian panellists] were allegedly pressured by other panelists Lim Swee Tin and Termuzi Abdul Aziz into succumbing to the DPM’s [Muhyiddin Yassin] advice, at which point the three decided to stage a walkout.”

We find it mighty amazing that Lim Swee Tin can identify so few flaws in Interlok and endorse its use without remedy. As such, we urge that he should make his findings public so that other researchers who have read the book can lend our oversight.

About these ads
Comments
3 Responses to “That ‘Chinese’ fler in the Interlok review panel”
  1. Sinosabah says:

    Is he a Chinese fler ? He looks 100% like Malay fler and 100 % a Muslim with his songkok. Another Ridhuan Lim. Ask him to eat BBQ pork first before he crown his surname Lim ! Make shame to Lim’s clan. Lim Chong Eu will vomit if he is still alive.

  2. Yeah says:

    http://www.malaysiakini.com/doc/saranan_pindaan_interlok.php

    Why don’t hartalmsm list this documen from Uthaya Sankar and let EVERYONE read this for themselves?

  3. FochAvenue says:

    Ricebowl lah, my friends, as usual. Just like that so-called historian professor Khoo Kay Kim. Would you stake your integrity against your own rice bowl? Like the chinese flers’ say/question – integrity? how much a gramme does it cost?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: